Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorCaldart, Eloiza Telespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorChiappetta, Catarina Marconpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Eliana Francopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSanches, Edna Maria Cavallinipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRavazzolo, Ana Paulapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-27T06:34:37Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2011pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1678-0345pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/279328pt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Genomic DNA (gDNA) extraction allows genetic material accessible to apply molecular techniques for diagnostic and/or genomic characterization. The main goal of this work was to analyze comparatively three manual methods of genomic DNA extraction - DNAzol, FTA and Silica - evaluating quality and yield of the nucleic acids obtained. Materials, Methods & Results: Small ruminant blood and milk samples were submitted to the three extraction methods and maintained at - 20ºC for different periods of time: four to twelve months. DNA sample purity was estimated by spectrophotometric determination through the ratio between the optical density values obtained at wavelengths of 260 nm and 280 nm (A260/A280), and, indirectly, by the PCR amplification of the GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) housekeeping gene. DNA concentration was also determinate by spectrophotometry. In order to validate the comparison, statistical analysis were performed with the variables purity, concentration and PCR from the three different methods to both samples blood and milk. The cost and the time consumed to each method were estimated considering the reagents used. The results obtained have showed a great purity level (mean values of 1.61 to 1.88) in the samples extracted by DNAzol and Silica, maintained during 4 months at - 20ºC. Percentage of PCR positive results were greater to the samples extracted by DNAzol from blood as well as from milk. Although the highest DNA concentrations were detected in the samples extracted by FTA, this method has presented the lowest values of purity and the lowest percentage of PCR positive results. When comparing the two types of samples, the average of all PCR positive results was greater to the samples extracted from blood. In the same way, when analyzing the mean purity value all samples included, blood samples presented a better ratio than the milk counterparts, suggesting the presence of PCR inhibitors in the latter. Discussion: The results obtained did not permit to establish a relationship among sample time of maintenance at - 20ºC and variables of purity and concentration. On the other hand, PCR positive results were significantly greater to the samples extracted by DNAzol and FTA maintained frozen for 12 and 9 months than to those maintained for 4 months. The DNAzol extraction cost was slightly superior to the other two methods which presented similar results. The time consumed by the three methods was equally similar for both samples analyzed. Statistical analysis has permitted to confirm the results obtained, as well as show the reproducibility of the extraction methods. In the conditions used in this work, the method that presented the best performance was DNAzol followed by Silica, regardless of the sample type. Genomic DNA samples from milk have showed the lowest percentage of PCR positive results which suggest the need to include additional protocol steps in order to eliminate putative inhibitors of PCR. In conclusion, the variables analyzed have permitted determining the best extraction method to obtain gDNA to be used in PCR.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoporpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofActa scientiae veterinariae. Porto Alegre, RS. Vol. 39, n. 1 (2011), Pub. 945,pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectGenomic DNA extractionen
dc.subjectDNApt_BR
dc.subjectBlooden
dc.subjectCélulas sanguíneaspt_BR
dc.subjectAnálise comparativapt_BR
dc.subjectMilken
dc.subjectPequenos ruminantespt_BR
dc.subjectSmall ruminantsen
dc.subjectPCRen
dc.titleAnálise comparativa de métodos de extração de DNA genômico de células do sangue e do leite de pequenos ruminantespt_BR
dc.title.alternativeComparative analysis of genomic DNA extraction methods from small ruminant blood and milk cells en
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb000829790pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples