Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Vanessa Silvapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVelho, Gabriella dos Santospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Mateus Felipe Osório dospt_BR
dc.contributor.authorEvangelista, Kelly Alvespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGasperin, Bernardo Garzierapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPfeifer, Luiz Francisco Machadopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Rogériopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGoncalves, Paulo Bayard Diaspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGastal, Gustavo Desire Antunespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDalto, André Gustavo Cabrerapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRovani, Monique Tomazelept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T06:21:13Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2024pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1806-9614pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/274721pt_BR
dc.description.abstractThe impact of GnRH treatment on the day of TAI in beef cows has received limited investigation, especially concerning its association with estrus expression. Consequently, two experiments were conducted to assess the potential of GnRH treatment on the day of TAI to enhance fertility according to the expression or not of estrus in beef cows. Experiment 1 aimed to determine ovulation rate and luteal function, while Experiment 2 aimed to determine the effect of the two GnRH treatment approaches on pregnancy rate. In Experiment 1, multiparous Brangus suckling cows (n = 17) were submitted to an 8-day TAI protocol. Estrus occurrence was evaluated based on chalk removal on D10 (TAI) and cows were assigned to receive GnRH (25μg lecirelin; im) according to the group: GnRH (n = 7), regardless of estrus expression; or selectGnRH (n = 10), only cows not detected in estrus. Ovulation rate occurring until 77h after IVD removal did not differ (p = 0.17) between GnRH (85.7%; 6/7) and selectGnRH (100%; 10/10). Also, corpus luteum size and serum progesterone concentration were not affected (p>0.05) by treatments. In Experiment 2, crossbred taurine suckled cows (n = 384) were submitted to the same protocol as described in Experiment 1 and were randomly allocated to GnRH or selectGnRH groups. There was no difference in P/AI between groups (selectGnRH = 55.6%; GnRH = 54.3%; p = 0.7) 30 days after TAI. As expected, there was a pronounced effect (p<0.0001) of estrus expression on P/AI (Estrus = 61.5%; No estrus = 33.0%), regardless of group. In summary, ovulation timing and rate and luteal function did not differ between groups. Also, GnRH administration only in cows that do not show estrus is recommended, considering hormone savings and similar conception rate.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal reproduction. Belo Horizonte. Vol. 21, no. 1 (2024), e20230123, 7 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectGnRHen
dc.subjectHormônio liberador de gonadotropinapt_BR
dc.subjectInseminação artificial em tempo fixo (IATF)pt_BR
dc.subjectTimed artificial inseminationen
dc.subjectEstrusen
dc.subjectEstropt_BR
dc.subjectOvulationen
dc.subjectOvulaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectConception rateen
dc.subjectCorpo lúteopt_BR
dc.subjectPrenhezpt_BR
dc.subjectBovinospt_BR
dc.titleDoes GnRH treatment at TAI regardless of estrus occurrence increase pregnancy rate in crossbred Bos taurus suckled cows?pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001200461pt_BR
dc.type.originNacionalpt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples