Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Gerardo Vinicio Beltranpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Laura Poochpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Andressa dept_BR
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Iraci Lucena da Silvapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Luciana da Conceiçãopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFregni, Felipept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCaumo, Wolneipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-31T02:30:30Zpt_BR
dc.date.issued2019pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1662-453Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/197552pt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This paper aims to determine if hypnotic analgesia suggestion and transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) have a differential effect on pain perception. We hypothesized that transcranial direct-current stimulation would be more effective than hypnotic analgesia suggestion at changing the descending pain modulating system, whereas the hypnotic suggestion would have a greater effect in quantitative sensory testing. Design: This is a randomized, double blind and crossover trial. Settings: All stages of this clinical trial were performed at the Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Subjects: Were included 24 healthy females aged from 18 to 45 years old, with a high susceptibility to hypnosis, according to the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C (15). Methods: The subjects received a random and crossover transcranial direct-current stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (2 mA for 20 min) and hypnotic analgesia (20 min). Results: Only hypnotic suggestion produced changes that are statistically significant from pre- to post-intervention in the following outcomes measures: heat pain threshold, heat pain tolerance, cold pressure test, and serum brain-derivate-neurotrophic-factor. The analysis showed a significant main effect for treatment (F = 4.32; P = 0.04) when we compared the delta-(1) of conditioned pain modulation task between the transcranial direct-current stimulation and hypnotic suggestion groups. Also, the change in the brain-derivate-neurotrophic-factor was positively correlated with the conditioned pain modulation task. Conclusion: The results confirm a differential effect between hypnotic suggestion and transcranial direct-current stimulation on the pain measures. They suggest that the impact of the interventions has differential neural mechanisms, since the hypnotic suggestion improved pain perception, whereas the transcranial direct-current stimulation increased inhibition of the descending pain modulating system. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03744897. Perspective: These findings highlight the effect of hypnotic suggestion on contraregulating mechanisms involved in pain perception, while the transcranial direct-current stimulation increased inhibition of the descending pain modulating system. They could help clinicians comprehend the mechanisms involved in hypnotic analgesia and transcranial direct-current stimulation and thus may contribute to pain and disability management.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in neuroscience. Lausanne. Vol. 13 (June 2019), 662, 15 p.pt_BR
dc.rightsOpen Accessen
dc.subjectHipnose anestésicapt_BR
dc.subjectHypnotic analgesiaen
dc.subjectEstimulação transcraniana por corrente contínuapt_BR
dc.subjectTranscranial direct-current stimulationen
dc.subjectDorpt_BR
dc.subjectPain thresholden
dc.subjectConditioned pain modulationen
dc.subjectBrain-derivate-neurotrophic-factoren
dc.subjectPainen
dc.titleComparison of hypnotic suggestion and transcranial direct-current stimulation effects on pain perception and the descending pain modulating system : a crossover randomized clinical trialpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.identifier.nrb001097145pt_BR
dc.type.originEstrangeiropt_BR


Thumbnail
   

Este item está licenciado na Creative Commons License

Mostrar registro simples